I think that, in a couple of days or weeks or months, many of the Dems who voted for Scott Brown tonight are going to be kicking themselves. Don't get me wrong, Martha Coakley was an abysmal candidate, she had a ton of gaffes, didn't try very hard, and clearly condescended to the electorate. From what I've read, Brown was smart, energetic, compassionate, and reasonable. It was also a terrible idea for anybody who cares about progressive policy to vote for him.
Congressional elections (particularly for the House) in this hyperpartisan age are becoming increasingly like parliamentary elections. In the UK, you may be voting for MP from Pole-otter on Teacozyshire, but really you're voting for whether you want Gordon Brown or David Cameron to be Prime Minister. Same thing applies in the US House of Reps. Party discipline is so strong that even "moderates" in the House vote with their party 80-90% of the time - and they always vote with their party on the all-important questions of which party gets the majority (and thus the committee chairmanships and the ability to introduce or totally block legislation). It may be tempting to cross party lines to vote for a moderate, reasonable, not-at-all-like-Sarah-Palin guy like Scott Brown, but you have to remember that a vote for Scott Brown is a vote for wacko Mitch McConnell for Majority Leader. Charlie Rangel is my current Congressman. In my opinion he's crooked and half-senile, but in a close race between him and a reincarnated Teddy Roosevelt I'd vote for Rangel if TR was going to caucus with John Boehner and Eric Cantor.
No comments:
Post a Comment